Neil
Blomkamp, director of District 9 and Elysium recently apologized for the
latter, admitting he had relied too much on its appealing concept and neglected to
pay the same attention to a satisfactory screenplay. This statement sounds
sincere on one hand, but we would appreciate it more if it meant that Blomkamp
has learned from his mistakes. Unfortunately, everything he accuses his
previous film for can be used to describe his new one as well…
Chappie is, precisely, a promising idea that would
need a much more powerful script in order to be effective. This idea is the
creation of a form of artificial intelligence (Chappie) that needs to discover
the world from the beginning, in a process that resembles a child’s upbringing.
As a concept, it contains an intrinsic humane element, as well as the potential for substantial parallelisms with man himself and the formation of his
perception of the world. But most of all, it shows that Blomkamp can still
demonstrate a sense of filmmaking creativity: he consciously tries to follow
the rules of different genres simultaneously, creating a violent, R-rated…
“family” film, with no intention of compromising by subjugating one genre to
the other.
As
expected, unfortunately, this is exactly what the South-African director stumbles
upon. He creates a film that doesn’t really know what kind of film it wants to
be. The violent action often gives its place to a humane approach and the latter to
the lighthearted humour, with the film being disorientated and almost never truly
functional. Moreover, the music composed by Hans Zimmer, despite being otherwise interesting, often seems to force the transition from one tone to the other, thus
only making it clumsier. Chappie’s biggest
flaw, however, is its script’s incapability to convince about almost anything
that happens throughout the film. From the criminals’ transformations into either
tender parental figures or repentant heroes to the naively humanized robot
Chappie, the film’s concept feels annoyingly rough. Also, some details like the
battery sign on Chappie’s chest and the obvious product placements cannot but make
things worse. As a result, the sentimental elements seem melodramatic and the
action never feels exciting, with the humour being the only actually amusing thing left, although it tonally confuses the film even more.
It is worth
mentioning that here, apart from certain hints about religion, the social
subtext of Blomkamp’s previous works is absent. Lastly, Yolandi Visser and
Ninja, members of South-African rap group Die Antwoord, star in the film as
themselves for some reason –and some of their songs are included in the
soundtrack. Ninja is at times enjoyably comical, whereas Yolandi Visser should have given a considerably stronger performance for her poorly written character to
feel engaging.
Chappie has undoubtedly good intentions but it would
need a more elaborate screenplay in order to be sufficiently solid and convincing.
Blomkamp misses a second chance (after decent, but not memorable Elysium) to live up to the triumph of District 9, only this time, his sci-fi
vision seems worryingly ‘blurred’…
No comments:
Post a Comment